42
📖 Lesson

Higher Order Brain Functions-I

PSYP610 - Neurological Bases of Behavior

๐ŸŽฏ Objectives

The students would be familiarized with the role of higher order brain functioning ๐Ÿง โšก. This is the role of the highly evolved areas of the brain ๐Ÿ“ˆ, the cerebral cortex ๐Ÿง .

๐Ÿ“‹ Brain Correlates

  • Language ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Speech Production ๐Ÿ’ฌ Comprehensions ๐Ÿ‘‚, Aphasias ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ
  • Visuospatial ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ“, the man who mistook his wife for a hat? ๐ŸŽฉโ“
  • Apraxia's ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿคš (Neuropsychological tools ๐Ÿ”ง)
  • Brain correlates of Learning and Memory ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ’พ, Amnesia ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ญ, Verbal/Nonverbal memory ๐Ÿ“š
  • (Neuropsychological tools ๐Ÿ”ง๐Ÿงช)

๐Ÿง  Higher Order Functioning

When we refer to the higher order functioning โšก๐Ÿง , we are focusing on the cortical control of major functions ๐ŸŽ›๏ธ. As we stated in our earlier chapters ๐Ÿ“š, the higher the animal on the evolutionary scale ๐Ÿ“ˆ the more the cerebral cortical control over these functions and development of newer functional connections ๐Ÿ”„.

๐Ÿ”ฌ Behavioral Neurosciences Goals

Behavioral neurosciences is attempting to ๐ŸŽฏ:

  • Understand functions such as language ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ, emotions ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ˜ข, learning ๐Ÿ“–, memory ๐Ÿ’ญ and psychopathology ๐Ÿง โš ๏ธ
  • Develop models to explain the function of cortical areas as they relate to behavior ๐Ÿง โ†”๏ธ๐ŸŽญ

We would discuss language ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ which humans have evolved as specialized communication ๐Ÿ‘ฅ. This is not just communication but language is intertwined with development of healthy and pathological behaviors ๐Ÿง โœ…โŒ.

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Language

Language: This is among the most important higher order function ๐Ÿง โšก, and is uniquely human ๐Ÿ‘จ but not so, because if we look around us we can see examples of communication in other animals as well ๐Ÿพ. For example, Bird songs ๐Ÿฆ…๐ŸŽต dog's growling ๐Ÿ• are complex communication system ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ, with the variation - which can communicate the state of one dog to another ๐Ÿ•โ†”๏ธ๐Ÿ• โ€“ even across species communication can take place through these signals ๐ŸŒ.

๐Ÿ’ Limbic vs Cortical Control

In the squirrel monkey's ๐Ÿ’ language comes under limbic control ๐Ÿง , in human's ๐Ÿ‘จ vocalization is both:

  • Limbic (nonverbal) ๐Ÿ˜ญ: cries, groan, gasps ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
  • Cortical (verbal, and symbolic) ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฌ: structured language

The development of language is based on capabilities already present in the nervous system ๐Ÿงฌ๐Ÿง .

๐Ÿงฌ Evolution of Language

Therefore, the evolution of language involves ๐Ÿ“ˆ:

โ€ข Appropriate development and evolution of cognitive and communication abilities and apparatus ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ. The abilities of primates are limited with categorization of calls ๐Ÿ’ i.e., the alarm calls are different from the mating calls ๐Ÿ””โค๏ธ. These do not have the sophisticated mechanism for variation as humans have ๐Ÿ‘จโšก.

โ€ข A structure of language in a formal system of signs and symbols ๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ”ค

โ€ข Development of the language in children ๐Ÿ‘ถ who have the capability of doing so ๐Ÿง โœ…

๐Ÿฆด Physical Apparatus for Speech

Speech is difficult (fairly impossible) for a non-human primate ๐Ÿ’โŒ and young humans ๐Ÿ‘ถ as the appropriate mechanisms have not developed physically ๐Ÿฆด. It is only about 50,000 years ago โฐ the tracts and physical apparatus for language evolved ๐Ÿ“ˆ (this is controversial ๐Ÿค” and the brain ๐Ÿง  and language capabilities ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ must have evolved together ๐Ÿ”„).

๐Ÿต Language in Non-Human Primates

Communication Non human primates: primitive ๐Ÿ’, gestures ๐Ÿคš, postures ๐Ÿง, (more nonverbal ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ฌ) calls of different types: alarm ๐Ÿšจ, distress ๐Ÿ˜ฐ, territoriality ๐Ÿ  threat ๐Ÿ˜ก but not complex communication such as, "how are you today?" ๐Ÿ‘‹ This is not possible for animals even the higher order primates ๐Ÿต (except for humans ๐Ÿ‘จ).

๐Ÿต Washoe the Chimpanzee

In innovative experiment carried out by Gardiner and Gardiner ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ”ฌ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ”ฌ where they trained a chimpanzee Washoe ๐Ÿต to communicate with humans using the American Sign Language ๐ŸคŸ. The chimpanzee learnt over a hundred signs ๐Ÿ’ฏ and exhibited capability of communication equivalent to two years (human) ๐Ÿ‘ถ with "slot grammar" such as a human child would use: long darkness for tunnel ๐Ÿš‡. However this chimpanzee was not able to verbalize ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ.

๐Ÿ”Š Primate vs Human Language

In primate's one call, one sound is communicating one message ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ”Š, whereas human language uses a combination of a few sounds to lead to thousands of words ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฌ (with intonations entirely different interpretation ๐ŸŽต, grammatical limitations and boundaries ๐Ÿ“. The same sound uttered in different ways in different situation leads to a different interpretation ๐Ÿ”„).

๐Ÿงฌ Shared Genetics

However, many experimenters such as Premack and Premack ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ”ฌ have led us to rethink ๐Ÿค”. First and foremost, man and chimpanzee share 96% genes ๐Ÿงฌ it is possible that chimpanzee can develop language as humans did ๐Ÿตโžก๏ธ๐Ÿ‘จ.

๐Ÿต Lana at Yerkes Primate Institute

Lana ๐Ÿต, a chimpanzee at the Yerkes Primate Institute ๐Ÿข, developed grammatical relationships on her own ๐Ÿ“ such as saying "Lana wants banana" ๐ŸŒ and connected novel strings of symbols using computer ๐Ÿ’ป and other symbols ๐Ÿ”ฃ, innovation in picking up and expanding on the learnt words ๐Ÿ’ก demonstrated that there were capabilities in the primates closest to humans ๐Ÿตโ‰ˆ๐Ÿ‘จ. There was not much learning by interaction and socialization ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ‘ฅ.

๐Ÿ‘ถ Language Development Requires Interaction

We must understand that language development requires learning by interaction and socialization ๐Ÿ‘ฅ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ. How does a child learn a language? ๐Ÿ‘ถโ“ Through imitation ๐Ÿ”„ and reinforcement โœ… of the words expressed till they become meaningful and can get the desired objects such as candy ๐Ÿฌ or food ๐Ÿฝ๏ธ.

Even human children if brought up without such stimulation do not develop language ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ even though they have the capability of doing so ๐Ÿง โœ…. For example, children reared by wolves ๐Ÿบ don't have the human language ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ฌ; they can only communicate like the wolves by snarling ๐Ÿ˜ค, growling ๐Ÿ˜ก or barking ๐Ÿ•.

๐Ÿ’ฌ Speech Production and Comprehension

In order to understand speech ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ, we move through the absence of speech ๐Ÿšซ. Stroke ๐Ÿฅ, accident ๐Ÿš— or any other traumas โš ๏ธ which lead to loss of speech ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ.

๐Ÿšซ Aphasia

Aphasia: One of the disorders of speech is Aphasia which is disorder of comprehension ๐Ÿ‘‚โŒ or production ๐Ÿ’ฌโŒ of speech.

Speech production: is based on several abilities ๐ŸŽฏ:

  • Sensation and perception of the surrounding ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ‘‚
  • Memories and imagination ๐Ÿ’ญ
  • Connection between past and present โฐ๐Ÿ”„
  • Vocal capabilities ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ
  • Articulation musculature ๐Ÿ‘„๐Ÿ’ช

๐Ÿฅ Paul Broca's Discovery

Paul Broca ๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš•๏ธ a French neurologist described a patient who had great difficulty in producing speech ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ฌ. Broca described the cases of 14 patients at a conference ๐Ÿ“‹ โ€“ and his paper went unnoticed โš ๏ธ. These were stroke patients ๐Ÿฅ who had middle cerebral arterial supply of blood to the Sylvain fissure affected ๐Ÿฉธ leading to similar difficulties. He then identified this area as inferior prefrontal cortex ๐Ÿง .

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Broca's Aphasia

Broca's Aphasia (Aphasia: Greek word ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท, A: without ๐Ÿšซ, phasia: speaking out ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ):

Broca's area in the frontal lobe ๐Ÿง  controls the musculature ๐Ÿ’ช and other mechanisms (air vibrating in the vocal cords ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ) and damage to inferior left frontal lobe โš ๏ธ, The Broca's area contains motor memories of tongue, lips, jaw, coordinated and sequenced movements ๐Ÿ‘…๐Ÿ‘„. It lies adjacent to the controls of face and lip ๐Ÿ˜ฎ, though the posterior parts of Cerebral Cortex want to say it ๐Ÿ’ญ but the frontal damaged area makes it difficult ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ฌ.

๐Ÿ“Š Characteristics of Broca's Aphasia

Broca's Aphasia: is mainly a disorder of expressive speech ๐Ÿ’ฌโŒ. This results in slow laborious and non-fluent speech ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ. Broca's aphasics make an effort to locate words to express what they want to say ๐Ÿค”, they mispronounce words but usually come out with meaningful sentences ๐Ÿ“โœ….

These aphasics have difficulty in small grammatical mistakes such as the use of a, the, some, in, about (linking words ๐Ÿ”—โŒ).

They can articulate little words with grammatical meanings: Function words are difficult โŒ, but content words come easily โœ…, as they can convey what the patient is trying to say ๐Ÿ’ญ:

"Ah Monday, Ah DAD, Paul and Dad, hospitalโ€ฆ Wedโ€ฆ. 9p.m." ๐Ÿ’ฌ (Good glass 1976, p 278 cf Carlson 1994 and Bridgeman 1988 ๐Ÿ“š)

Their speech is telegraphic ๐Ÿ“Ÿ, and there is no impairment of speech comprehension ๐Ÿ‘‚โœ….

๐Ÿ”ฌ Neuropsychological Tests for Broca's Aphasia

A series of Neuropsychological tests which can assess Broca's aphasia are for example ๐Ÿ“‹:

A picture is shown to the patient where a horse ๐Ÿด and a cow ๐Ÿ„ are standing in the same posture. In one picture the cow is kicking the hind leg of the horse with its hind legs ๐Ÿฆต, and the second picture the kicking is reversed ๐Ÿ”„. There are questions of what is happening who is kicking who and where? โ“ The correct grammatical order is required ๐Ÿ“ (Shwartz, Saffron and Marin 1980 ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ”ฌ).

Task sequencing commands are also given ๐Ÿ“‹, word order is disrupted because they difficulty in carrying out a sequenced response ๐Ÿ”„โŒ. If this area is stimulated it leads to a coordinated movement โšก๐Ÿ’ช, lesioning blocks the coordinated sequence ๐Ÿšซ. Questions can be "Pick up a red ball and touch green circle" ๐Ÿ”ดโšช, difficulty in saying it is difficulty of muscles of speech production ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธโŒ.

๐Ÿ‘‚ Speech Comprehension

In Speech Comprehension ๐Ÿ‘‚ the areas in the auditory lobe ๐Ÿง  are involved. Wernicke's area is located in the Middle and Posterior region of Superior Temporal Gyrus ๐Ÿง .

The speech comprehension area collects information ๐Ÿ“ก, matches ๐Ÿ”„, recognizes โœ…, and analyzes it ๐Ÿง  and sends it to the articulation areas (through the arcuate fasciculus ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ”—).

๐Ÿ”Š Recognition of a Word

Recognition of a word involves ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ:

  • a) Sensation ๐Ÿ‘‚
  • b) Perception ๐Ÿง 
  • c) Memories of the sequencing of sound articulation ๐Ÿ’ญ๐Ÿ”Š

Damage to this region leads to receptive speech disorder ๐Ÿ‘‚โŒ.

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Wernicke's Aphasia

Primary characteristic of Wernicke's aphasia is that the speech appears better than Broca's โœ… fluency rhythm as the articulation intact ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ but what they say does not make sense โŒ๐Ÿ’ฌ. However, they cannot recognize the deficit ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿค”. Poor speech comprehension ๐Ÿ‘‚โŒ and production of string of meaningless words ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธโ“ characterizes Wernicke's aphasia.

Wernicke's patients are not aware of their problems with speech ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ญ. Wernicke's patients not aware of their problems are speech ๐Ÿคท. They are not aware that people don't understand them ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ‘ฅ, or they are having any difficulty ๐Ÿค”โŒ. What they say or hear is incomprehensible to them and others ๐Ÿ’ฌโ“.

๐Ÿ’ฌ Example of Wernicke's Speech

Speech appears correct to a foreigner ๐ŸŒ but to those who know the language it is nonsensical ๐Ÿ’ฌโŒ. As an example ๐Ÿ“‹:

When Asked What Do You Do? ๐Ÿค”

The patient replies ๐Ÿ’ฌ, "Mista oxycge,wann tell happened when happened, herent, kell, cam ho, renrapiers" โ“ and the patient is satisfied that he was answering the question โœ…๐Ÿ˜Š.

๐Ÿ”ฌ Neuropsychological Tests for Wernicke's Aphasia

The neuropsychological tests for speech comprehension ๐Ÿ“‹ e.g. the Patient tested through questions of receptive speech ๐Ÿ‘‚: point to pen โœ๏ธ, your nose ๐Ÿ‘ƒ

The deficit is at the semantic level ๐Ÿ’ญ (meaning of the words ๐Ÿ“) their deficit is in understanding speech and its meaning ๐Ÿ‘‚๐Ÿ’ฌโŒ.

๐Ÿ“š References

  • Carlson, N. R. (2005). Foundations of physiological psychology. Pearson Education New Zealand.
  • Pinel, J. P. (2003). Biopsychology. (5th ed). Allyn & Bacon Singapore.
  • Bloom, F., Nelson., & Lazerson. (2001), Behavioral Neuroscience: Brain, Mind and Behaviors. (3rd ed). Worth Publishers New York
  • Bridgeman, B. (1988). The Biology of Behavior and Mind. John Wiley & Sons, New York
  • Brown, T.S. & Wallace, P.S. (1980). Physiological Psychology. Academic Press, New York
  • Bradshaw, J. L. & Mattingley, J. B. (1995). Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ACADEMIC PRESS